Give us a Call
+6 07 5566445
Send us a Message
iemcjbm@gmail.com
Opening Hours
Everyday: 9AM - 5PM

Published Clinical Research

All positive — No negative data

 

• All published studies are positive and show benefit

• Many important studies were refused indexing by MEDLINE computerized index (censorship)

• Five indexed studies with positive data showing benefit were published with deceptive negative conclusions:

1. Kitchell et al 1963, American Heart Journal, Reappraisal

2. Sloth-Nielsen, Guldager, et al 1991 Danish Study

3. Can Rij, et al 1994 New Zealand Study

4. Knutson, Andersen, et al Canada 2004, PATCH Study

5. Diehm, Schettler, et al 1986 Heidelberg Study

For detailed analysis and scientific references:  www.drcranton.com

 

Kitchell, et al 1963, American Heart Journal

Reappraisal

 

• 28 severe angina patients unresponsive to all other treatments, 23 had prior MI

• 71% improved after EDTA chelation

• 46% remained improved 18 months later with no further treatment

 

Sloth-Nielsen, Guldager et al, 1991 Danish Study

• Peripheral Vascular Disease with Claudication

• Maximum walking distance to claudication

• Chelation patients improved 100% more than controls

 

Van Rij et al, 1994 New Zealand Study

• Peripheral Vascular Disease with Claudication

• Maximum walking distance to claudication

• Chelation patients improved 78% more than controls

• Statistically significant increase in pulsatility

index, p = <.001

 

Knutson, Andersen, et al Canada 2004 PATCH Study

• Coronary artery disease, angina, 84 pts

• 75% fewer chelation patients subsequently had bypass surgery (3 out of 4 chelation patients avoided bypass surgery, compared with controls) Diehm, Schettler, et al

 

1986 Heidelberg Study

• Peripheral Vascular Disease with Claudication

• Maximum walking distance to claudication

• Chelation patients increased walking distance 400% more than controls

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *